Why do teenagers take such risks?
Many times teenagers take risks to ‘make a point.’ They are emotionally angry or hurt, and their emotional reaction is often a retaliatory over-reaction. The resulting behaviors may endanger others or themselves (or sometimes a mixture of both) though violence or defiance, cutting themselves, sexual or drug use acting out, or even driving irresponsibly, but the behavior carries a message! Good intervention must decipher the message from the behavior. Then the irritant can be removed, or if it cannot be removed, then the goal is give them better and more workable coping skills. This is often hard to do, and usually takes a lot of time and energy.
Teenagers may feel less ‘risk aversion’ because of their youthfulness. They often believe there is plenty of time in their lives to regain something if it is lost. They also tend not to see death as permanent, or they see the goal of their death as saying something like “my death will force you to understand or appreciate me.” Therefore, the prospect of risking death is not as aversive or frightening. This is perhaps because teenagers are more inclined to over-estimate the reward of a risk and not be so afraid of any subsequent discomfort or punishment. For example, the hope of gaining some euphoria, social status , or an object from drug use (usually they seek all three goals) is not outweighed by the possible malaise of a hangover or the risk of pregnancy.
These behaviors can also be the result of depressions and other psychiatric conditions. This makes the diagnosis so complex. Is it an emotional developmental phase, situational, or psychiatric problem? And how much of the choice to choose a behavior stems from neurological immaturity? Problems get worse with mixtures of psychological and neurological issues.
This then brings us to the second neurologically based reason teenagers take risks. The process seeking the rewards is thought to stem from the over activation of reward centers (such as the nucleus accumbens) while there is also an under activation of regulating brain area ( the frontal lobes). The combination of a strong social or psychological need to express an emotion fails to undergo the necessary regulation of a fully mature frontal cortex.
We could gather all these thoughts under the term of the day by day, ever-changing psycho-neurobiology of decision-making.
A 23-year old looked back at his “wild youth” and told me that “now, in my ripe old years, I can finally stop and say ‘humm, do I really want to do that?’ ”
Let’s now mix in caffeine, alcohol or drugs. We don’t give drugs or alcohol to infants or young children because of what it does to their brain’s development. Can we – or should we — carry that same concern to the teenager and young adult? Will that be too much of a social change? Is it as important to protect the 20-year-old brain as much as the 13-year-old brain?
(Remember to visit our page of Basic Definitions of terms used in these postings. )
Thanks.
Next post: more about for teenage risk taking and information about the immediate versus delayed responses.
